Legal Opinion

Kavanaugh v. Wheeling

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided February 26, 1940No. Record No. 2110PublishedCited by 17 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtSpratley, J.

This action was brought by C. W. Wheeling against B. J. Kavanaugh and F. P. Kavanaugh, partners, trading as the Lynchburg Rendering Company, and Thomas J. Hurley, to recover damages from personal injuries caused by the negligent operation of an automobile belonging to the Lynchburg Rendéring Company, and driven by Hurley, an employee of that firm.

B. J. and F. P. Kavanaugh, sometimes referred to as the defendants, plead the general issue and filed an affidavit, undér Virginia Code 1936, section 6126, denying that their automobile, at the time of collision, was being operated or controlled by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Morier v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Crowell v. DuncanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  3. Lincoln v. FrenchSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Appalachian Power Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  5. Barnes v. HamptonCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rosemary J. Martin v. Cavalier Hotel Corporation, and Daniel P. Batchelor, Rosemary J. Martin v. Cavalier Hotel Corporation Daniel P. BatchelorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  2. Kensington Associates v. WestSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  3. Morris v. CartwrightNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  4. McNeill v. SpindlerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  5. Jordan v. Shelby Mut. Plate Glass & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API