Legal Opinion
Dorsey Products Corp. v. United States Rubber Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 9, 1964PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendant moves to dismiss the second, third and sixth causes of action in the amended complaint. It is alleged that defendant manufactures a polyester called “Naugatile” and certain related products to be used with it. Plaintiff Dorsey Products Co. entered into a distributorship agreement with defendant for the sale of these products. It is alleged that defendant made certain statements as to the development and qualities of the “ Naugatile ” *867products, which statements were made to induce plaintiff to enter into the distributorship agreement and, on the strength of them, plaintiff did so and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- International Products Co. v. Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Doyle v. Chatham & Phenix National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Lumbrazo v. WoodruffNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
3Cited by18 opinions
- White v. GuarenteNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Henneberry v. Sumitomo Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Pappas v. Harrow Stores, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Coolite Corp. v. American Cyanamid Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Henneberry v. Sumitomo Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.