Legal Opinion
Fulginiti v. Roxbury Township Public Schools
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 17, 1996No. Civ. 94-1025 (WHW)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLS, District Judge.
The parties have submitted cross-motions for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of ■ the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case concerns the outer parameters of a local School Board’s obligation under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et. seq. (“the IDEA”), to provide a free public education and related services to one of its young, severely-handicapped citizens. For reasons stated below, summary judgment is granted in favor of the defendant, Roxbury Township Public Schools (“the Board”).
Background
Carissa Fulginiti…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Irving Independent School District v. TatroSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sound Ship Building Corp v. Bethlehem Steel Company (Incorporated)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Detsel by Detsel v. Board of Educ. of AuburnDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Getty Oil Co. v. ClarkDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1985
- Skelly v. Brookfield Lagrange Park School District 95District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Morton Community Unit School District No. 709 v. J.M.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1997
- Fulginiti v. Roxbury Township Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997