Legal Opinion
Lindsey v. Loughlin
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 13, 1985No. 82 CV 1964PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
The attached Report and Recommendation of Hon. Shira A. Scheindlin, United States Magistrate, is hereby adopted as the Opinion of this Court. No objections were filed within the time permitted.
It is hereby ORDERED that defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the Complaint is granted.
The Clerk shall make copies of this Order and shall serve them upon the parties.
SO ORDERED.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
July 25, 1985
SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, United States Magistrate.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
Plaintiff, Melvin Lindsey, appearing pro se, has brought this 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Miloslavsky v. AES Engineering Society, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Dukes v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Haussman v. FergusDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Gittens v. Garlocks Sealing TechnologiesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1998
- Mathews v. U.S. Shoe Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.