Legal Opinion
Miloslavsky v. AES Engineering Society, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 10, 1992No. 91 Civ. 6042 (RWS)PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant, the City of New York (“The City”) has moved under Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., for summary judgment to dismiss the § 1983 complaint of plaintiffs Yury and Tatyana Miloslavsky (the “Miloslavskys”). Upon the facts and conclusions set forth below, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.
Prior Proceedings
The complaint was filed September 9, 1991 by the Miloslavskys pro se against the City and the Audio Engineering Society (“AES”) following the dismissal by the Honorable Robert P. Patterson, on August 27, 1991, of an earlier action against AES for…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Caldarola v. CalabreseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Martinez v. SimonettiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Caldarola v. CalabreseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Singer v. Fulton County SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Singer v. Fulton County SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.