Everett Sweet v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The State petitions for rehearing following this court’s December 6, 2013, opinion, in which we affirmed the post-conviction court’s denial of Sweet’s petition for post-conviction relief. While the State prevailed in our original appeal, in its petition for rehearing the State asserts that we mistakenly relied on our Supreme Court’s opinion in Norris v. State, 896 N.E.2d 1149 (Ind.2008), rather than our Supreme Court’s opinion in Helton v. State, 907 N.E.2d 1020 (Ind.2009). The State is correct. Norris involved a petition for…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Timberlake v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Hall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Lee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Helton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eric D. Lacy v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Michael T. Barnett v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
- Theodore T. Schwartz v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016