Legal Opinion
United States v. Atalig
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 6, 2007No. 06-10511PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:
Fermina Manglona Atalig appeals her conviction for conspiracy to submit false claims to the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 287 1 & 1001 2 and seven counts of making false statements in violation of § 1001. A jury ih the Northern Mariana Islands found that Atalig knowingly made material false statements when submitting applications for federal Disaster Unemployment Assistance (“DUA”) benefits on behalf of Rota residents. We hold that the false statement statute does not require the government to prove which particular agency within the executive branch…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hubbard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Juan Gonzalez-TorresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Carmelo Bello-Bahena, United States of America v. Carmelo Bello-BahenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Demond Jamal CamperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. StarnesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- United States v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Neil A. ThomsenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Yong Jun LiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.