Legal Opinion

Robbins v. Robbins

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1850PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THIS was a bill in chancery to correct a mistake in a deed. A part of the defendants were infants. No process appears to have been served upon these infants, but a guardian ad litem was appointed, who, the record states, waived the service of the process on them. This he could not do — see Hough v. Canby, 8 Blackf. 301 — unless the heirs were present in Court, which does not appear, and, on error, cannot be presumed. For this error we are compelled to reverse the decree below, with costs.

The decree is reversed. Cause remanded for further proceedings.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hough v. CanbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1846

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Bell v. BellArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Hawkins v. Hawkins' AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Abdil v. AbdilIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Strayer v. LongSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API