Metropolitan Edison, Aplt. v. City of Reading
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JUSTICE DONOHUE
In this appeal, we are required to construe the language of the utility service facilities exception (“Utility Exception”) to governmental immunity contained in the Political Subdivision Tort Claims Act (“Tort Claims Act”), 42 Pa.C.S. § 8542(b)(5). The Commonwealth Court concluded that where a dangerous condition of the facilities of a utility system is created by the negligent action or inaction of a local agency or its employees, the Utility Exception does not apply. Because the Commonwealth Court misconstrued both the Utility Exception and the gravamen of the lawsuit…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bowling v. Office of Open RecordsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Bayada Nurses, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Chanceford Aviation Properties, L.L.P. v. Chanceford Township Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Fitzpatrick v. PenfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Gall v. Allegheny County Health DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Redmond v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Quinn v. TrittDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020