Legal Opinion
Dynatron Corp. v. United States Rubber Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 20, 1961No. Civ. No. 8432PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TIMBERS, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves, pursuant to Rule 34, Fed.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A., for production and discovery of documents.
The action is brought to recover damages for claimed breach of alleged warranties by defendant with respect to certain polyester resins sold by defendant to plaintiff for its use in the manufacture of polyester resin products which in turn were sold by plaintiff for use in making automotive body repairs.
Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship, plaintiff being a citizen of Connecticut and defendant a citizen of New Jersey.
By the instant motion plaintiff…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. 5 Cases, More or Less, Containing "Figlia Mia Brand", Etc. (5 Cases)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Gordon v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- States v. 5 CasesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1949
3Cited by4 opinions
- Industrial Commission v. HolohanArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- State ex rel. Wilson v. CopelandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Phoenix General Hospital v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Industrial Commission v. HolohanArizona Supreme Court · 1964