Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Wilson v. Copeland

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1985No. 13770PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN PROHIBITION

2Per curiam

This is an original action in prohibition. The sole question before the court is whether the respondent exceeded his jurisdiction in ordering production of documents pursuant to Rule 58.01 because the requests were over broad in that the documents and other things requested were not designated with the reasonable certainty required by Rule 58.01(b),1 which in pertinent part reads as follows:

“... The request shall set forth the items to be inspected either by individual item or by category, and describe each item and category with reasonable par-ticularity_”…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Great American Insurance Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Porter Ex Rel. Aylward v. GottschallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  3. Dynatron Corp. v. United States Rubber Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
  4. Paiewonsky v. PaiewonskyDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1970

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Meeker v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. May Department Stores Co. v. RyanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. State Ex Rel. Upjohn Co. v. DaltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Meeker v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API