State ex rel. Wilson v. Copeland
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN PROHIBITION
2Per curiam
This is an original action in prohibition. The sole question before the court is whether the respondent exceeded his jurisdiction in ordering production of documents pursuant to Rule 58.01 because the requests were over broad in that the documents and other things requested were not designated with the reasonable certainty required by Rule 58.01(b),1 which in pertinent part reads as follows:
“... The request shall set forth the items to be inspected either by individual item or by category, and describe each item and category with reasonable par-ticularity_”…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Great American Insurance Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Porter Ex Rel. Aylward v. GottschallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
- Dynatron Corp. v. United States Rubber Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
- Paiewonsky v. PaiewonskyDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1970
4Cited by4 opinions
- Meeker v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- May Department Stores Co. v. RyanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Upjohn Co. v. DaltonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Meeker v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989