Legal Opinion

Smith v. Barrett

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1933No. 5064PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Justice.

The plaintiff and appellant, A. M. Smith, is the owner of a corner lot on the southwest corner of the intersection of Main street and Fourth South street in Logan City. The defendant and respondent is the building inspector of Logan City, Cache county, Utah. Plaintiff applied to defendant for a building permit to erect a gas and oil service station on the property owned by plaintiff and in plaintiff’s application for a writ of mandate particularly described.

The application for building permit was denied because applicant had not secured written consent of the required number…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carter v. City of BluefieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Marshall v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Union Trust Co. v. SimmonsUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Dupont v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API