Legal Opinion

Henrickson v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2000No. Nos. 67520-1; 67793-0PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The State seeks to commit both Donald Henrickson and Michael Halgren as sexually violent predators under chapter 71.09 RCW. This court has previously held that to commit an individual as a sexually violent predator, due process requires proof of a recent overt act “whenever an individual is not incarcerated at the time the petition is filed.” In re Personal Restraint of Young, 122 Wn.2d 1, 41, 857 P.2d 989 (1993). The Legislature codified this holding by amending the statute to require proof of a recent overt act when a person “has since been released from total confinement,” but not when a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Allen v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Detention of Henrickson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API