Legal Opinion
Clark v. Rose
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided August 11, 1984No. Civ. A. 3:83-0766PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDERS
NEESE, Senior District Judge.
The petitioner Mr. Stanley Barham Clark applied pro se to this Court for the federal writ of habeas corpus, claiming that he is in the custody of the respondent-warden pursuant to the judgment of July 27, 1979 of the Circuit Court of Rutherford County, Tennessee in violation of the Constitution. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). Annexed to his application is Mr. Clark’s affidavit that he is unable to pay the cost of this proceeding or give security therefor and a statement of his belief that he is entitled to redress. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Swanson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
- Delbridge v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
- United States v. Washita Construction Company, and Billy Ray AnthonyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Arthur J. Burton v. Dale E. FoltzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.