Legal Opinion

Arthur J. Burton v. Dale E. Foltz

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 23, 1987No. 85-1363PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILBURN, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner-appellant Arthur Jackson Burton appeals the decision of the district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner argues that: (1) the law of the case doctrine precludes reconsideration by this court of issues decided on the appeal of his first petition for habeas relief; (2) the jury instruction in the state court impermissibly shifted the burden of proof on intent in violation of Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 99 S.Ct. 2450, 61 L.Ed.2d 39 (1979); and (3) the Sandstrom error was not harmless under the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. John Charles Richard MentzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. Davis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Freeman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1988
  4. Ernest Alexander v. Dale FoltzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  5. WONGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API