Legal Opinion

Van Geest v. Stocks

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1939No. 27325. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

C. Van Geest and Doris Van Geest, his wife, instituted this action against Mamie Stocks and W. B. Severyns, as sheriff of King county, for the purpose of procuring an injunction restraining defendants from proceeding with the sale of a parcel of real estate in King county, pursuant to execution issued on a judgment in favor of defendant Mamie Stocks, as plaintiff, and against plaintiff C. Van Geest and one Alfred R. Ogden, as defendants. Plaintiffs also prayed that their title to the real estate be quieted as against Mrs. Stocks’ judgment. They also demanded judgment for five hundred dollars…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bortle v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Merritt v. NewkirkWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Oregon Improvement Co. v. SagmeisterWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  4. McGregor v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Woste v. RuggeWashington Supreme Court · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mountain v. PriceWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Meng v. Security State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Great American Indemnity Co. of New York v. GarrisonDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API