Legal Opinion
Hanifen v. Price
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Decided August 4, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions
This was a suit in equity by John E. Hanifen, trading as John E. Hanifen & Co., against Edward A. Price, Francis H. Inloes, and Petera I!. Worrall, trading as Fred Butterfield & Co., for alleged infringement of a patent for a knitted fabric.
1Opinion of the Court
TOWNSEND, District Judge.
The questions herein are presented at final hearing on a hill alleging infringement of patent No. 374,888, issued December 13, 1887, to complainant’s assignor, Levi Bywater, for a knitted fabric. The inventor states as follows:
“My Invention consists of a new and improved textile fabric having the face yarn Thereof looped on the stitches of the back yarn, as hereinafter set forth, the said face, which is formed of mohair, worsted, or other yarn, being beat up so as to present a wavy or curly surface, and the hack, which is formed of woolen or other yarn, brushed, so as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bate Refrigerating Co. v. SulzbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Hadden v. CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Hurlbut v. SchillingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Hanifen v. E. H. Godshalk Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898
- Hanifen v. E. H. Godshalk Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hanifen v. ArmitageU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1902
- Welsbach Light Co. v. American Incandescent Lamp Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899
- Westinghouse Mach. Co. v. General Electric Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1912
- Claude Neon Lights, Inc. v. Rainbow Light, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1931
- Consolidated Rubber-Tire Co. v. Finley Rubber-Tire Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1901