Wilson v. Geiss

Lees, C.

Appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial of the issues between him and the interveners in a garnishment proceeding. Although the findings of fact are attacked on the ground that they are nof supported by the evidence, the principal question is whether they justified the conclusions of law.

In substance the findings are that plaintiff is a judgment creditor of the defendant Geiss; that the intervener, the Minnesota Sugar Company, is a creditor to whom he mortgaged some of his *213personal property; that the other interveners, except James J. Clifford, are creditors…