Batson-Milholme Co. v. Faulk
Texas Supreme Court
Motion for rehearing of an application for writ of error which had been refused. The action was brought by Faulk .against Batson-Milkolme Company, for personal injuries. Judgment went for plaintiff and defendant company appealed. On affirmance (209 S. W., 837) the company applied for a writ of error, and on its refusal filed a motion for rehearing thereon in terms criticized in the opinion following.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Phillips
delivered the order of the court.
There is matter contained in the motion for rehearing filed for the plaintiff in error directed to our action in refusing a writ of error which we do not think has any proper place in a document addressed to this court. It is said in effect that the question involved has only been carelessly considered by this court and the several Courts of Civil Appeals which have passed upon it. The contrary is true with respect to this court’s action, and we believe it to be equally true in respect to the action of the Courts of Civil Appeals. It is furthermore plainly…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Producers Oil Co. v. DanielsTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- George W. Armstrong Co. v. AdairTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Producers' Oil Co. v. DanielsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Shore v. CarlCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.