Legal Opinion

Shore v. Carl

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 3, 1926No. 2622PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Sixty-two parties, including the plaintiff in this suit, C. H. Carl, D. F. Ashbrook, and 0. M. Shore, signed the following subscription agreement:

"Hereford, Tex., March, 1921.
"We, the undersigned, hereby associate ourselves together for the purpose of establishing a sanitarium in the town of Hereford, to be known as the Hereford Sanitarium.
"We hereby select and appoint George L. Muse as our trustee and agree to pay to the said Muse the several sums of money written opposite our names, upon demand; provided that as much as ($3,000.00) three thousand dollars is hereto subscribed.
"It being our…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Thompson v. SchmittTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Ebell v. BursingerTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Hollister v. McCameyTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Bingham v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Victor Refining Co. v. City National Bank of CommerceTexas Supreme Court · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carl v. ShoreTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API