Legal Opinion

George W. Armstrong Co. v. Adair

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1923No. 3317PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Judge GALLAGHER,

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

This case is before us on certified question submitted by the Honorable Court of Civil Appeals for the Second District. Roy Adair, a minor suing by his mother as next-friend, was plaintiff and George W. Armstrong Company, Inc., was defendant in the trial court and they will be so designated here.

The Honorable Court of Civil Appeals in its certificate makes the following statement of the substance of plaintiff’s pleadings:—

“The defendant was engaged in the business already mentioned in a large building…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gulf, Texas & Western Railway Co. v. DickeyTexas Supreme Court · 1916
  2. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. MorganTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Poe v. Continental Oil & Cotton Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  4. Batson-Milholme Co. v. FaulkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Producers Oil Co. v. DanielsTexas Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Galveston-Houston Electric Railway Co. v. ReinleTexas Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Galveston-Houston Electric Ry. Co. v. ReinleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Deborah Ferguson, Kathleen Rabjohns, and Michael Rabjohns v. Hospital Corporation International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. Houston Belt & Terminal Ry. Co. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Smith v. Great Altantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API