Legal Opinion

Crumel v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 13, 1936No. 14229PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Baker.

The application for the insurance policy in this case contained, among other provisions, the following:

“It is understood and agreed: 1. That the foregoing statements and answers are correct and wholly true, and, together with the answers to questions on Part B hereof, they shall form the basis of the contract of insurance, if one be issued.”
“I hereby certify that I have read the answers to the questions in Part.A hereof and to the questions in Part B hereof, before signing, and they have been correctly written, as given by me, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cooley v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  2. Wingo v. New Work Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
  3. Addison v. DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
  4. McLane v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  5. McLester v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nix v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  2. Atlantic Life Insurance v. BeckhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  3. Lipsey v. Life Ins. Co. of GeorgiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  4. Reese v. Woodmen of World Life Ins. Soc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  5. Reese v. Woodmen of World Life Ins. Soc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API