Legal Opinion

Cooley v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 12, 1929No. 12783PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court'was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

This is an action upon a policy of insurance in the sum of $500, alleged in the complaint and admitted in the answer to have been issued by the company and delivered to the insured, on March 1, 1928, upon the life of Emma Smith, and payable, in the event of her death, to' her daughter, the plaintiff Mamie Cooley.

The defense of the company was that at the time of the application, and at the time of the payment of the premium, and at the time of the issuance and delivery of the policy, the insured was suffering from a malignant…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Jeffries v. Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. FranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Life & Casualty Ins. v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Reese v. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. MandelbaumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. BatesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  2. Fender v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  3. Bradley v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  4. Nix v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  5. Ellis v. Capital Life and Health Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API