Legal Opinion

Michele M. v. Richard R.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 2008No. S-12510PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Michele M. and Richard R. dispute who should have custody of their son, Charles. 1 Richard and Michele initially had agreed that Michele should have primary legal and physical custody over Charles and Richard would have some visitation rights. Richard later moved to gain full custody of Charles after it became clear that Charles was doing poorly in school due in part to a high number of unexcused absences. Richard was temporarily awarded custody in April 2006. After a two-day trial in late 2006, Superior Court Judge Mark Rindner made Richard’s primary…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gratrix v. GratrixAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Jenkins v. HandelAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Siekawitch v. SiekawitchAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Dingeman v. DingemanAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Knutson v. KnutsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Williams v. BarbeeAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Stephanie F. v. George C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Barlow v. ThompsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. McAlpine v. PACARROAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Sarah D. v. John D.Alaska Supreme Court · 2015

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API