Legal Opinion

Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. Adams

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 12, 1986No. 84SC58Published

1Opinion of the Court

718 P.2d 508 (1986)

PAINE, WEBBER, JACKSON & CURTIS, INC., a corporation, and Sueann A. Ocrant, Personal Representative of the Estate of Lawrence Ocrant, Petitioners,

v.

Caryl ADAMS, Individually and as Trustee of the V.M. Johnson 1962 Trust, Respondent.

No. 84SC58.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

May 12, 1986.

Fairfield & Woods, Charles E. Matheson, Denver, for petitioners.

Roath & Brega, Charles F. Brega, J. Stephen McGuire, Stuart N. Bennett, Margaret C. Gilliam, Denver, for respondent.

LOHR, Justice.

We granted certiorari to review the judgment of the Colorado Court of Appeals in Adams v.…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,437 Hetty Fey v. Walston & Co., Inc., and Robert A. SpiraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  3. Hecht v. Harris, Upham & Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1968
  4. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  5. Christensen v. HooverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API