Malland v. Sims
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
This is an action for personal injuries tried to a jury. A verdict was rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $13,700. On motion for a new trial, the verdict was held to he excessive and the re- suit of passion and prejudice. The plaintiff was given the option of consenting to a reduction in the amount of the verdict to $7,500, and, he so consenting, a judgment followed upon the verdict as reduced, from which the defendants have appealed.
Appellants present here a number of interesting and important questions, but the conclusions we have reached on one of the questions makes it…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McInerney v. President, Managers & Co. of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Herrick v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Mayhew v. Yakima Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. StephensonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Lovell v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fink v. DixonWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- System Tank Lines, Inc. v. DixonWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Richards v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022