Legal Opinion

Malland v. Sims

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1933No. 24363. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

This is an action for personal injuries tried to a jury. A verdict was rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $13,700. On motion for a new trial, the verdict was held to he excessive and the re- suit of passion and prejudice. The plaintiff was given the option of consenting to a reduction in the amount of the verdict to $7,500, and, he so consenting, a judgment followed upon the verdict as reduced, from which the defendants have appealed.

Appellants present here a number of interesting and important questions, but the conclusions we have reached on one of the questions makes it…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McInerney v. President, Managers & Co. of Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Herrick v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Mayhew v. Yakima Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. StephensonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Lovell v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fink v. DixonWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. System Tank Lines, Inc. v. DixonWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Richards v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API