Legal Opinion

Hall v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 8, 1996No. CR-93-2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON RETURN TO REMAND

This cause was remanded to the trial court in order for the State to present sufficient evidence that the appellant had violated the terms of his probation, because the evidence on which the revocation had originally been based was hearsay.Hall v. State, 681 So.2d 247 (Ala.Cr.App. 1995). This court also ordered the trial court to enter written findings concerning its specific reasons for revoking the appellant's probation.

The record indicates that a hearing was held pursuant to the appellant's probation revocation on May 30, 1995. The transcript of that hearing indicates…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BelcherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Hall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chenault v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  2. Bell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  3. McCain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  4. Ewing v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API