Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Ormento v. Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth
United States District Court for the District of Arkansas
Decided January 30, 1963No. 3405 H. CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARTHUR J. STANLEY, Jr., Chief Judge.
This is a proceeding in habeas corpus. The petitioner raises the question as to the power of the Attorney General, acting through the Bureau of Prisons, to confine him in the United States Penitentiary at Leavenworth before an appeal from a judgment of conviction has been determined and when, pursuant to Rule 38, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, he has elected not to commence the sexwice of his sexxtence.
At the hearing it was stipulated that the petitioner, after a protracted trial, was convicted of conspiracy to violate statutes having to do with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Tinkoff v. ZerbstCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Vermillion v. AderholdDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1936
- Evans v. MadiganDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. RobbinsDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1971
- Leahy v. EstelleDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1974
- Gregory Comulada v. J. T. Willingham, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Products MarketingDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1968
- Dorssart v. BlackwellDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.