Legal Opinion

Evans v. Madigan

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 30, 1957No. 36617PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODMAN, District Judge.

Evans’ petition for the writ of habeas corpus raises the question whether the ■Attorney General has the power to con- ■ fine a defendant, convicted and sentenced to a long term of imprisonment, in the United States Penitentiary at Alcatraz, even though the defendant-has appealed his conviction and has elected not to com- . menee the service of his sentence, pursuant to Rule 38 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.

Petitioner contends that the Attorney General has no such power or authority. The Warden at Alcatraz, the respondent herein, contends that,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tinkoff v. ZerbstCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  2. Norris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  3. In re WilfongDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1947
  4. Smith v. HiattDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Vermillion v. AderholdDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gregory Comulada v. J. T. Willingham, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  2. United States ex rel. Ormento v. Warden, United States Penitentiary, LeavenworthUnited States District Court for the District of Arkansas · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API