Legal Opinion
Wolchok v. Kovenetsky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 25, 1948PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.
In this action for an injunction, a temporary injunction was denied, and plaintiff appeals from that order.
There is now in existence a collective bargaining agreement (hereinafter called the “ agreement ”) entered into between the employer, R. H. Macy & Co. (hereinafter called “ Macy ”) and a union described as Local 1-S, of the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, C.I.O. (hereinafter called 11 Local 1-S, C.I.O.”) which agreement the international union also signed as a party. This agreement does not expire until January 31, 1949, and the employer desires to perform all of its…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fur Workers Union, Local No. 72 v. Fur Workers Union, No. 21238Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Triboro Coach Corp. v. New York State Labor Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Fur Workers Union No. 21238 v. Fur Workers Union, Local No. 72Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Alexion v. HollingsworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
3Cited by10 opinions
- Phalen v. Theatrical Protective Union No. 1New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Fitzgerald v. AbramsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Caliendo v. McFarlandNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Art Steel Co. v. VelazquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Fitzgerald v. DillonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.