Murillo v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RYLAARSDAM, Acting P. J.
—This petitionfor a writ of mandate arises from an action under Welfare and Institutions Code section 6600 et seq. (Sexually Violent Predator Act; the Act) to have petitioner Richard Murillo civilly committed as a sexually violent predator. We are asked to determine whether the district attorney may propound requests for admissions, which, if admitted, might eliminate the state’s burden to prove the ultimate issues in the case.
Earlier cases have held that certain types of discovery under the Civil Discovery Act (Code Civ. Proc., § 2016.010 et seq.) apply to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. OttoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. YartzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Lackner v. NorthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- In Re ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Murillo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006