Second Nat. Bank v. Basuier
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of South Dakota. This was an action by the Second National Dank of Aurora, 111., against Charles Basuier and others, upon four promissory notes. On the trial in the circuit court the defendants had a verdict.
1Opinion of the Court
THAYER, Circuit Judge.
This was a suit by the plaintiff in error, the Second National Bank of Aurora, 111., against the defendants in error, who were the defendants in the circuit court, on four promissory notes executed by the defendants. Each note was for the sum of $650, and all of them were dated, “Canton, Dakota, December 17, 1888.” They were all drawn in the following form, except that two of the notes were payable May 1,1891, instead of May 1,1890:
“SUSoO.OO. Canton, Dakota, Dec. 17th, 1888.
“May 1st, 1800, after date, for value received, we, the undersigned, jointly and severally promise…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Farmers' Nat. Bank v. Sutton Manuf'g Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1892
- Adams v. SeamanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Hegeler v. ComstockSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
- Hastings v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Northern Pac. R. v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stadler v. First National BankMontana Supreme Court · 1899
- Golden Reward Min. Co. v. Buxton Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Cudahy Packing Co. v. State Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- Johnson v. ScharSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- State Nat. Bank v. Cudahy Packing Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1904