Northern Pac. R. v. Hogan
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of tlie United States for the District of Minnesota. Action by Cornelius Hogan against the Northern Pacific Railroad Company for injuries received in its employment as a brakeman. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
THAYER, District Judge'.
The facts disclosed by the record in this case, which was a suit for personal injuries, are substantially as follows: Cornelius Hogan, the defendant in error, was a brakeman, who had been in the service of the Northern Pacific Railroad Company, the plaintiff in error, for about two years prior to May, 1892. At that time he was serving the company in the capacity of head brakeman on a regular freight train running between Jamestown and Cargo, in the state of North Dakota. This train usually arrived in Jamestown from the west at about 7 o'clock in the evening, and left…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PrenticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Golden Reward Min. Co. v. Buxton Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. YatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
- Southern Pac. Co. v. SchoerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Northern Pac. R. v. MaseCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
- Stewart v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.