Legal Opinion

Brown v. Aldrich

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 1947No. Civ. 7254PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeek, J.

This controversy involves a question of the liability of an owner of a motor vehicle for the negligent operation thereof by another under the permissive use provisions of section 402 of the Vehicle Code. Although technically both the owner of the vehicle, C. H. Aldrich, and the driver thereof, Guadalupe Gonzales, the defendants against whom a recovery was had, are appellants herein, the parties in their briefs appear to treat Aldrich as the sole appellant and Gonzales as a defendant having a separable and adverse interest.

The record discloses that appellant Aldrich is the owner of three fruit…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. DeYoung v. DeYoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Souza v. CortiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Steele v. NagelIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Scheff v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Taylor v. Roseville Toyota, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Reed v. CortezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API