Legal Opinion

Kunzig v. Liquor Control Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1950No. Docket 41, Calendar 44,642PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyles, C. J.

In this case we are asked to define the respective powers of the liquor control commission and the State civil service commission as applied to the plaintiff, under the 2 constitutional amendments * by virtue of which said commissions were created.

In 1943, the State civil service commission, at the request of the liquor control commission, established in the classified civil service the position of business manager for that commission, designated as liquor control executive 7, and otherwise called executive director. The civil service commission provided tests for candidates and after…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thoman v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Reed v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Regents of the University v. Employment Relations CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Straus v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Durant v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Belco Petroleum Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Advisory Opinion on Constitutionality of 1978 PA 426Michigan Supreme Court · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API