Thoman v. City of Lansing
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
In the opinion of Mr. Justice SHARPE, Act No. 162, Pub. Acts 1933, (Comp. Laws Supp. 1940, § 3551-41 et seq., Stat. Ann. §15.511 et seq.) is held unconstitutional. I am unable to concur in that result. The pertinent portions of the act are quoted in my Brother's opinion. The statute is one pertaining to taxation:
"The presumption of constitutionality following taxing statutes is stronger than applies to laws generally and only where a taxing system clearly and palpably violates the fundamental law will it be held invalid." Michigan Central R. Co. v. Powers,201 U.S. 245, 267 (26 Sup. Ct. 459,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Michigan Central Railroad v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Youngblood v. SextonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Dullam v. WillsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- School District v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Stenson v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Bonner v. City of BrightonMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- Regents of the University v. Employment Relations CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Lockwood v. Commissioner of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Caterpillar, Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Consumers Power Co. v. Big Prairie TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.