Legal Opinion
United States v. Gary Minkin
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 18, 1975No. 74-1004PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSEN, Senior Circuit Judge.
I
Gary Minkin, operator of a salvage and used-parts business, was charged in a single-count indictment and convicted on a jury trial of a violation of the mail-fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1341. 1
The fraud involved, as implicit in the jury’s verdict, consisted in Minkin’s having devised and executed, together with a claims supervisor of the Hartford Insurance Group (Hartford), named Dace, a scheme to get Hartford to issue a comprehensive insurance policy to Minkin on a 1967 Cadillac El Dorado automobile (stated in the application to be a 1968 model) which had been…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. MazeSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. D. Spencer Grow and C. Oran MensikCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- Walter E. Fisher v. United States of America, Joseph E. Lindquist v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. Kenneth O. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Ronald F. CalvertCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Anthony Medina (91-1852) Nathaniel Wilson (91-1869) Neville King (91-1891/1892)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. James T. McNeiveCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Forriss D. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.