Legal Opinion
Slaven v. Engstrom
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 30, 2012No. Civil No. 11-1632 ADM/JJKPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*998MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ANN D. MONTGOMERY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On December 16, 2011, the undersigned United States District Judge heard oral arguments on Plaintiffs Shawn Slaven and Julie Slaven’s (the “Slavens”) Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 13] and Defendants Hennepin County, Dan Engstrom (“Engstrom”), Donothan R. Bartley (“Bartley”), and Jamie L. Cork’s (“Cork”) Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 24]. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ (Engstrom, Hennepin County, Bartley, and Cork are collectively “Defendants”) motion is granted, and the Slavens’…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shawn Slaven v. Dan EngstromCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Brennan v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
- Wang Anderson v. The State of NebraskaDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2019