Legal Opinion
Shawn Slaven v. Dan Engstrom
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 22, 2013No. 12-1457PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
Shawn and Julie Slaven, individually and as parents and next friends for C.S., A.S., and J.S., (collectively, “the Slavens”) brought suit against Hennepin County, a governmental entity within the State of Minnesota, and three of its employees 1 in their official capacities (collectively, “Hen-nepin County”) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of their procedural due process rights stemming from their child-protection case. Count I of the complaint alleged that Hennepin County violated the Slavens’ procedural due process rights by failing to provide adequate notice of an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Vives v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ronald Duhe v. Little Rock Arkansas, City ofCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Oglala Sioux Tribe v. Van HunnikDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2014
- Sulzle v. SulzleNebraska Supreme Court · 2024
- Alvarado v. Collins-BazantDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2020
- Brennan v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.