Legal Opinion
Antos v. Bell & Howell Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 7, 1995No. 93 C 5684PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CASTILLO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Richard Antos (“Antos”) sues defendant Bell & Howell Company (“Bell & Howell”) for age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act [hereinafter ADEA], 29 U.S.C. § 623 et seq. In a one count complaint, Antos alleges that Bell & Howell violated the ADEA when it terminated his employment. Antos also claims that Bell & Howell breached a contractual promise to pay him 52 (rather than 36) weeks of severance benefits following his termination. Bell & Howell moves for summary judgment, contending that Antos’ ADEA claim…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fabregas v. I.T.T. Intermedia, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1997
- Young v. Lincoln National Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1996
- Finan v. HachmeisterDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024