Legal Opinion
Seamon v. Upham
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided February 14, 1983No. P-81-49-CAPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JUSTICE, Chief Judge.
This 29th day of January, 1983, the motions of the plaintiffs for leave to file a supplemental complaint, for leave to add parties plaintiff, and for a preliminary injunction, are before the court for hearing. A motion to dismiss for want of proper venue has been filed by the Republican Party, a defendant.
Proper disposition of these motions hinges upon an understanding of the past history of this civil action. As originally filed on September 1, 1981, this case challenged the legality and constitutionality of an act of the Texas legislature, which apportioned Texas…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Nixon v. HerndonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Nixon v. CondonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Upham v. SeamonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- The A. H. Emery Company v. Marcan Products Corporation, Marshall Control Products Corp., Hugh A. Mills, Ronald R. Marshall, and David E. GoldingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Melvin D. Reuber v. United States of America (Two Cases.) Melvin D. Reuber v. Food Chemical News (Two Cases.)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Martin John Beattie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- Jordan v. WinterDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1984
- PKWare, Inc. v. MeadeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000
- Nash v. BluntDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.