Legal Opinion

Upham v. Seamon

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 1, 1982No. 81-1724PublishedCited by 215 opinions

1Per curiam

After the 1980 census, Texas’ congressional delegation increased from 24 to 27 members. A reapportionment plan, Senate Bill No. (SB1), was enacted on August 14, 1981, and then submitted to the Attorney General for preclearance. While it was pending before him, suit was filed in the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Texas challenging the constitutionality of SB1 and its validity under §2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 79 Stat. 437, as amended, 42 U. S. C. § 1973. A three-judge court was empaneled, held a hearing, and delayed any further action until after the Attorney…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Whitcomb v. ChavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Chapman v. MeierSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Connor v. FinchSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Beer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by215 opinions

  1. League of United Latin American Citizens v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Branch v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Abrams v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Terrazas v. RamirezTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Marc Veasey v. Greg AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016

210 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API