Legal Opinion

Nixon v. Condon

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 2, 1932No. 265PublishedCited by 273 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Caedozo

The petitioner, a Negro, has brought this .action against judges of election in Texas to recover damages for their refusal by reason of his race or color to permit him to cast his vote at a primary election.

This is not the first time that he has found it necessary to invoke the jurisdiction of the federal courts in vindication of privileges secured to him by the Federal Constitution.

In Nixon v. Herndon, 273 U. S. 536, decided at the October Term, 1926, this court had before it a statute of the State of Texas (Article 3093a, Revised Civil Statutes, afterwards numbered 3107) whereby the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Buchanan v. WarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Nixon v. HerndonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by273 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

268 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API