Legal Opinion
Bell v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 27, 2002No. 94-CF-937, 94-CF-794, 94-CF-1480, 95-CO-618, 97-CO-939, 99-CO-1341, 99-CO-1507, 99-CO-1551PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Senior Judge:
After a 1994 jury trial in this drive-by shooting and hot-pursuit case, appellants Antonio E. Bell, William D. McClain, and Charlie Webb 1 were convicted of first-degree premeditated murder while armed of Richard Tillman, D.C.Code §§ 22-2401, -3202 (1996); 2 assault with intent to kill (“AWIK”) while armed of Anthony Irving, D.C.Code §§ 22-501,-3202 (1996); 3 AWIK while armed of Lawrence Hutton; assault with a deadly weapon (“ADW”) of Alonzo Smith, D.C.Code § 22-502 (1996); 4 possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime of violence (“PFCV”) (murder of Tillman…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wilson-Bey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Lee Carrell v. United States (Revised Version)District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Ellis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Blackson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Kigozi v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.