Hahn v. Brickell
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
— When this case was here upon the former appeal, 135 Wash. 189, 237 Pac. 305, the judgment was reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial because of error in the admission of testimony.
Upon the second trial, at the conclusion of the evidence, the defendants challenged the sufficiency thereof and moved for a directed verdict, which motion was denied and the cause submitted to the jury. A verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiff and, after a motion for new trial had been made and overruled, judgment was entered upon the verdict, from which the defendants appeal. The preliminary…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. GayWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- State v. BeemanWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Hahn v. BrickellWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Fillmore v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 1879
- Lindquist v. Pacific Coast Coal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by5 opinions
- Moen v. ChestnutWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Lindberg v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Lambert v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- Martin v. Foss Launch & Tug Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
- Weinman v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933