State v. Graham
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
Defendant brings forward eight assignments of error in the trial below. We find the assigned errors without merit.
Defendant contends the courts of this State were without jurisdiction over the crimes of breaking and entering of and larceny from the Maury Post Office. The Congress has passed laws to protect United States post offices from breaking and entering and larceny. 18 U.S.C. §§ 2115, 1707. Our State, in compliance with clause seventeen, section eight of the first article of the United States Constitution, consents to the acquisition of lands within the State by the United…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. CradleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. PhiferSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. MeshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- State v. DeesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Commonwealth v. MangumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hubbard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
- State v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016