Legal Opinion

Keel v. MFA Mutual Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 29, 1976No. 47030PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HODGES, Vice Chief Justice.

This is a companion case to Robert Keel v. MFA Insurance Company, Okl., 553 P. 2d 153 (1976), also decided today. Two of the three propositions urged by appel lant were resolved in the companion case. It was determined multiple policies issued to the insured may be pyramided until insured is fully indemnified for his damages, and the ‘‘consent to sue” “other insurance clauses” are repugnant to 36 O.S.1971 § 3636 and, therefore, void. The opinion also set forth procedural options for an insured who has a claim against an uninsured motorist, made the ruling…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keel v. MFA Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Lemons v. LemonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Filtsch v. SipeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. Allen v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Messler v. Simmons Gun Specialties, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Elliott v. City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. Johnson v. NascaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
  4. Webb v. WileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Vaughn v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API