Legal Opinion

Hillabrand v. American Family Mutual Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 2006No. S-05-049PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hannon, Judge, Retired.

NATURE OF CASE

The plaintiff was seriously injured in an automobile collision while driving a personal vehicle in the course of the business of a corporation of which he was an owner, officer, director, and employee. The other driver was at fault, and that driver’s insurance company paid the $25,000 limits of its liability policy. The company insuring the plaintiff’s personal vehicle paid the limits of the $25,000 of underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage on that vehicle. The plaintiff’s corporation had several vehicles which were insured by the defendant for UIM coverage…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Scott-Pontzer v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. American Economy Insurance Co. v. BogdahnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
  4. Sproles v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Kaysen v. Federal Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Ohio Casualty GroupNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Kluver v. DeaverNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Fokken v. SteichenNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Jones v. Shelter Mutual Insurance CompaniesNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. MORTGAGE EXP., INC. v. Tudor Ins. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API