Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Fokken v. Steichen

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 2008No. S-06-614, S-06-615PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCormack, J.

NATURE OF CASE

Judgment was entered against John P. Steichen and in favor of Maurice Fokken and Deanna Wright Miller (collectively the appellees) in separate legal malpractice actions brought against Steichen. The appellees then instituted separate garnishment proceedings against Coregis Insurance Company, Inc. (Coregis). Coregis had issued Steichen’s law firm a lawyers professional liability insurance policy (the Policy) which the appellees allege provides coverage for their claims against Steichen. After consolidating the appellees’ cases, the district court for Douglas County entered…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Husker Aviation, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Spaghetti Ltd. Partnership v. WolfeNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Peterson v. Ohio Casualty GroupNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. SommerNebraska Supreme Court · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hofferber v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Myers v. ChristensenNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. DeWester v. WatkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Rickerl v. Farmers Ins. ExchangeNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Woodle v. Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API