Legal Opinion

State v. Barker

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 27, 1977No. 7546PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

We are asked herein to decide whether testimony as to defendant’s prior drug-related offenses was improperly admitted into evidence at his trial for possession of marijuana. For the reasons which follow below, we hold that no abuse of discretion occurred through the trial court’s admission of this testimony.

Defendant William Barker was tried by jury on April 14, 1976, on the charge of possession of a controlled drug, i.e., marijuana, in excess of one pound. A verdict of guilty was rendered. During the course of the trial, the defendant took exception to rulings of the trial court admitting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
  2. State v. PalumboSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  3. State v. RumneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
  4. State v. GarceauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
  5. State v. BallentineSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  2. State v. WhitneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  3. State v. SimondsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  4. State v. GruberSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API